|
20 November 2007
UK government loses data on 25m Britons
The UK government has lost personal data on every child in the
country, as well as national insurance numbers and bank account
details of parents and carers claiming child benefit, on two password-protected
CDs sent through an internal mail service.
“HMRC has a responsibility towards the public. It has failed
to meet the standards expected of it,” Alastair Darling, the
chancellor, told in the House of Commons on 20 November. “I
deeply regret this and apologise for the anxiety that will be caused.”
Paul Grey, the chairman of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
(HMRC), has resigned over the loss. The data, on all children, parents
and carers claiming the UK’s universal child benefit, was
sent from HMRC in Washington, in the north-east of England, to the
National Audit Office in London, which had requested it for audit
purposes.
The lost data includes the names, addresses and dates of birth
of every child in Britain, as well as financial information on adult
claimants. A total of 25 million people are affected – more
than two-fifths of the UK’s population.
It was sent by a junior employee of HMRC through an internal mail service on 18 October. When the NAO reported the
data had not been received, the employee resent the discs, although
this time by registered, recorded post.
The original discs were reported lost on 8 November, and the chancellor
was informed on 10 November. He told the House of Commons that he
delayed reporting the loss initially to allow a thorough search
to take place by Customs officials, and when this failed to produce
results, to involve the police and to allow the UK’s banks
and building societies to establish checks on every affected account
to look for suspicious activity.
“So far, they have found no evidence of such activity,”
Darling said. Checks have been back-dated to 18 October: “Again,
so far, they have found no evidence of unusual activity.”
He added that the police do not believe the data has fallen into
the wrong hands, but conceded that it was “highly probable”
that the Data Protection Act has been breached.
Darling announced an enquiry into HMRC’s data handling processes,
to be carried out by Kieran Poynter, UK chairman of audit firm PricewaterhouseCoopers.
He said HMRC has changed its procedures, so the transmission of
such data requires sign-off from a senior manager.
The opposition called for the government to abandon its plans for
a national identity register and identity cards as a result of the
breach. George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, who called the HMRC’s
loss a “catastrophic mistake” which should mark the
final blow for the identity card scheme.
He added that the government had compromised the information security
of every family in Britain. “They simply cannot be trusted
with people’s personal information,” he said. “Get
a grip and deliver a basic level of competence.”
Avivah Litan, a senior Gartner analyst, said she could not think
of any more serious breach of personal information. Although the
US Veterans Administration lost a laptop with a similar number of
names, addresses and social security numbers, this did not include
bank account details, which is the most highly-prized kind of data
for fraudsters.
“Banks will be scrambling to think what to do. They will
be looking for signs of fraud, and the first they see, they will
shut down accounts,” she said.
Litan said that, as the government has said the information is
password-protected, “it’s obviously not encrypted”.
She said such data should be encrypted even when within the organisation,
and should be sent only through encrypted electronic transfer. Although
she added that only 1% of data lost on physical media is put to
criminal use, the publicity around this case makes fraud more likely.
In the worst case, a breach of the data could cost the UK $300 million
(£145m), she said.
In a statement, the information commissioner Richard Thomas said:
“This is an extremely serious and disturbing security breach.
This is not the first time that we have been made aware of breaches
at the HM Revenue and Customs – we are already investigating
two other breaches. Incidents like these illustrate that any system
is only as good as its weakest link.”
“The alarm bells must now ring in every organisation about
the risks of not protecting people’s personal information
properly. As I highlighted earlier this year, it is imperative that
organisations earn public trust and confidence by addressing security
and other data protection safeguards with the utmost vigour,”
he continued, adding that he welcomed the enquiry by Kieran Poynter.
On 14 November, the Information
Commissioner’s Office told a House of Lords enquiry that
the government should introduce criminal penalties including prison
sentences for severe breaches of personal data.
FCO breached data privacy of
50 000 visa applicants (13 November 2007)
HMRC in identity theft scare
(9 October 2007)
News
index
|